MIRA-Ev:A Benchmark for Granular Evidence Detection and Relational Reasoning in Clinical Exams
Iker De la Iglesia, Johanna Ramirez-Romero, Jose Maria Villa-Gonzalez, Irune Urroz García, Ander Barrena, Aitziber Atutxa
Abstract
Clinical NLP evaluation remains dominated by multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), which scores only final-answer accuracy and cannot detect when a model reaches the correct diagnosis while grounding it in irrelevant, absent, or contradictory evidence. We introduce MIRA-Ev, a clinical argument mining benchmark built on Spanish Médico Interno Residente (MIR) licensing-exam cases, re-annotated by expert clinicians with span-level premises, claims, and directed support/attack relations, and released in parallel Spanish (native), English, and Basque versions, the first clinical argumentation resource in Basque. MIRA-Ev organizes evaluation into a three-tier task hierarchy: evidence sentence retrieval, argumentative component extraction, and relation classification.
Topics
Classified with taxonomy v2 on Wed, 2 Sept 2026.