Skip to results
MLSift
← Feed

A Comparative Evaluation of Embeddings and LLMs in a Greek Book Publisher Setting - The CUP Dataset

Katerina Papantoniou, Panagiotis Papadakos, Theodore Patkos, Dimitris Garefalakis, Nikos Vardakis, Dimitris Plexousakis

cs.CL cs.AI

Abstract

We present CUP, a Greek book retrieval benchmark consisting of 868 catalog records and 104 expert-annotated queries with graded relevance judgments. We evaluate sparse (BM25), dense (sentence-transformers), hybrid, and LLM-assisted retrieval methods in this book-search setting. Multilingual embeddings outperform Greek-specific models, while hybrid retrieval performs best overall. A query-level analysis shows that BM25 excels at named-entity queries, while dense and hybrid methods improve natural-language, noisy, cross-lingual, and concept queries. Field-aware prompting has model-specific effects, while LLM TOC summarization improves TOC-only retrieval and LLM post-filtering improves early-stage retrieval at a high cost. Overall, CUP enables real-world evaluation of Greek retrieval across lexical, semantic, noisy, and cross-lingual queries.

Topics

Classified with taxonomy v2 on Wed, 2 Sept 2026.

The PDF is 1–3 MB. Open it in your browser's viewer, or load it here.

Open PDF