PowerSlider: Exploiting Phase Asymmetry for LLM Serving under Demand Response
Yueying Li, Jiayang Chen, Yuanfan Chen, Leo Han, Haoran Qiu, Esha Choukse, Rodrigo Fonseca, Udit Gupta
Abstract
AI inference clusters are increasingly constrained by instantaneous power, not just energy: grid operators condition new capacity on demand response, imposing time-varying power caps. Existing LLM serving systems optimize a static energy objective or shed fixed priority tiers under load; either way, goodput collapses when the power envelope moves. An LLM pipeline is not a uniform load: compute-bound prefill loses throughput almost linearly with GPU frequency, memory-bound answer decode sustains it down to $0.57\times$ nominal, and reasoning's thinking phase couples KV-cache capacity to scheduling -- so a cap should be steered to where each watt costs the least performance. PowerSlider does so with a new Flex SLO contract that turns bounded user slack into an optimization constraint, prefill--think--answer disaggregation exposing per-stage frequency and KV control, and a Karush--Kuhn--Tucker (KKT) online solver re-solving within 7.7 ms of every cap change, backed by a consolidated fail-safe that power-gates drained instances when DVFS bottoms out on static power. On SGLang with production traces, \sys{} sustains 78.3\% online goodput at a 30\% cap reduction versus 47.6\% for the best of five baselines ($1.64\times$), holds latency-critical tails within $1.3\times$ of nominal (baselines: $2.3$--$6\times$, up to $12\times$), and delivers 92\% mean goodput through a replayed CAISO grid-emergency day bottoming at $0.41\times$ (54\% at the trough; every baseline below 7\%).
Topics
Classified with taxonomy v2 on Sat, 5 Sept 2026.