Infrared-visible image fusion (IVIF) has no ideal fused reference, so algorithms are ranked by scalar objective metrics that formalize proxies for information transfer, structure, or source similarity. These proxies often disagree with the judgment that ultimately matters: given the same sources, which of two fused results does a human prefer? Direct pairwise comparison is an established protocol for relative subjective assessment, but its cost grows quadratically with the number of algorithms. We present the Learned Perceptual Image Fusion Measure (LPIFM), a source-conditioned model that operationalizes the human A/B/Tie comparison protocol as a repeatable, scalable surrogate. LPIFM jointly observes the two sources and two fused candidates and predicts whether A is better, B is better, or the two are perceptually equivalent. Supervision comes from a new dense preference corpus covering all 6,300 unordered comparisons among 25 fusion methods on the 21 scenes of the VIFB benchmark, labeled under a blinded, randomized, two-stage protocol with expert adjudication. Across scene- and method-generalization settings, LPIFM attains pairwise accuracy of 0.792-0.840 and Spearman correlation of 0.941-0.977 with human-derived tie-aware Bradley-Terry rankings; on full 25-method pools it exceeds the strongest conventional metric by 0.163-0.211 in accuracy. Its verdicts are also antisymmetric under candidate swap, free of preference cycles, and fully transitive, matching or exceeding the internal consistency of the human panel. We publicly release the dataset, model weights, and code. LPIFM offers a practical instrument for human-aligned comparison and ranking of IVIF methods at scale.
Reward models guide text-to-image (T2I) systems toward outputs aligned with human preferences. However, typical reward models such as HPSv3 are trained on pre-annotated data from earlier T2I models, without accounting for quality discriminative shifts arising from evolving model capabilities and reinforcement learning (RL) iterations, limiting their broader applicability. In this work, we propose HPSv3++, a reward model framework that elevates the HPSv3 model for varying T2I model capabilities and their RL iteration changes across the full capability-iteration spectrum. Specifically, we first introduce HPDv3++, a 212K dual-dimension preference dataset annotated for text fidelity and aesthetic quality using a recent high-capability (Qwen-Image) model with human supervision. We then propose a two-stage training framework. Stage 1 employs data-aware orthogonal gradient projection to incorporate diverse aesthetic perception from HPDv3++ while preserving the original effective human preference knowledge in HPSv3. Stage 2 further leverages unlabeled data from T2I models spanning different capability levels and RL iterations, and introduces a joint capability-iterations conditioned signal for the reward model together with a standard deviation-driven unsupervised guidance mechanism, strengthening reward model across the capability-iteration spectrum. HPSv3++ achieves state-of-the-art preference prediction, outperforming HPSv3 9.8% on HPDv3, 5.5% on GenAI-Bench, while achieving 79.1%/88.1% on our proposed HPDv3++. When used for T2I RL training, it consistently improves GenEval scores across diverse T2I models, demonstrating its wide-range capabilities. The code is available at https://github.com/PlantPotatoOnMoon/HPSv3-PlusPlus.