Attention Alignment Between Humans and Vision-Language Models

Visual perception depends on top-down goals and bottom-up sensory mechanisms. Vision-language models implement both, allowing us to treat each component as a separable hypothesis about what drives where we look. We compared spatial attention maps from six vision-language models against human fixation heatmaps recorded on 200 images during two tasks (general description and social captioning). The six models spanned a 2$\times$2 factorial of CNN vs.\ ViT encoders crossed with LSTM vs.\ Transformer decoders, plus Molmo 7B-D and Qwen3.5 9B. We found that both decoder and encoder architecture shaped alignment, but decoder choice dominated. LSTM vs.\ Transformer decoders increased alignment by 40--50 percentage points (80--87\% vs.\ 40--59\% of the human noise ceiling). In contrast, CNN vs.\ ViT encoders contributed a secondary 5--20 point advantage depending on decoder family, with CNN-LSTM the most aligned model overall (85--87\%). Despite their alignment advantage, LSTM-decoder attention maps were spatially diffuse and minimally task-differentiated; ViT-Transformer, the weakest in alignment, showed the sharpest spatial concentration and strongest task differentiation. A hemispatial-neglect simulation confirmed that ablating attention impacted LSTM decoders more than Transformer decoders. In an exploratory extension using TRIBE-simulated synthetic neural responses, fixation alignment and neural relevance dissociate: CNN-Transformer attention maps better predicted synthetic brain activity despite lower fixation alignment, with attention maps best predicting early visual cortex. Together, top-down and bottom-up components trade off what they predict in behavioral and synthetic neural data.

KODA: Contrastive Representation Comparison and Alignment for Vision-Language Foundation Models

Vision-language foundation models such as CLIP and SigLIP provide widely used representations for multimodal learning systems. While these models are typically compared through downstream performance, such evaluations often do not explain how their representations differ structurally. In this work, we study this problem through the task of Contrastive Embedding Clustering: identifying sample subsets that are weakly clustered under one representation but strongly clustered under another. We propose \emph{Kernel Optimization for Discrepancy Analysis (KODA)}, a kernel-based framework for contrastive representation comparison and alignment. KODA constructs unified multimodal kernels through modality-wise kernel composition and formulates discrepancy discovery as a constrained optimization problem that searches for coherent structures in one representation while suppressing coherence in a reference representation. This yields interpretable discrepancy directions associated with specific sample subsets and modality interactions. To scale KODA to large vision-language datasets, we develop randomized low-dimensional approximations of joint kernels using random projections, including Random Fourier Features for shift-invariant kernels. Empirically, KODA identifies consistent and interpretable discrepancy structures across vision-language representations and provides sample subsets for representation alignment. The code is available at https://github.com/yokiwuuu/KODA.