Most prior works focused on conflicts between an LLM's internal parametric knowledge and externally provided context. In contrast, we investigate how LLMs handle conflicts that arise within contextual knowledge itself. We introduce a taxonomy of six types of contextual conflicts (factual, inferential, temporal, granularity, perspective, and ambiguity) and contribute a comprehensive dataset ContextConflict for this setting. The dataset contains 5,781 samples, covers both reasoning and summarization tasks, and includes both explicit contradictions and implicit conflicts that require multi-step reasoning. Experiments on nine LLMs show that current models still fall short in resolving contextual knowledge conflicts. We further provide mechanistic interpretability insights into how LLMs process such conflicts, revealing their latent awareness of conflicts and the representational geometry underlying conflict processing. In addition, our analysis uncovers a consistent model bias towards earlier evidence, and this positional preference serves as a key obstacle to effective conflict resolution. Motivated by these findings, we further propose a simple training-free, label-free steering method that steers activations to encourage a more comprehensive incorporation of evidences for better conflict resolution. On our dataset, the method consistently improves accuracy on reasoning tasks and generates higher-quality, more balanced summaries for summarization tasks.
Political evasion refers to responses that engage with a question while withholding the requested information. Recent NLP work frames political evasion as a classification task using a two-level taxonomy of response clarity and fine-grained evasion strategies. Existing work on response clarity and evasion classification is limited to English, leaving open whether the taxonomy and model behavior transfer across languages and political contexts. We introduce PolERo, a dataset of 3,574 human-annotated question-answer pairs extracted from official transcripts of five Romanian presidents. We evaluate multiple classification approaches on both datasets under matched conditions, including TF-IDF baselines, fine-tuned encoder models, a proposed sliding-window encoder, and zero/few-shot LLM prompting. We study cross-lingual transfer through joint bilingual training and machine-translation-based data augmentation. Our results indicate that fine-tuned encoders are competitive, cross-lingual transfer is asymmetric, and ambivalent evasion categories involving pragmatic cues remain the main challenge across all model families.
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) models are typically trained on documents that describe facts from a prosecutorial perspective. Existing datasets further exhibit severe label imbalance toward guilty outcomes. Consequently, these models suffer from "Guilty Bias", blindly accepting the prosecution's narrative as objective truth. Previous studies employing three-step reasoning structures or training on synthetically generated innocence data improve overall accuracy, but they still fail to mitigate bias at inference time. In this paper, we introduce OBJECTION, an inference-time pipeline that integrates an Adversarial Lawyer Agent into each 3-step reasoning of offense, unlawfulness, and culpability. Unlike generic critics, our agent actively challenges the model's presumptions of guilt by injecting legal defense arguments at each reasoning stage. To thoroughly evaluate this, we present a new "Natural Innocent" dataset including 3.4k real-world cases, overcoming the limitations of synthetic innocence benchmarks. Test results show that OBJECTION drastically reduces the False Guilty Rate (FGR) from 82.93% (SOTA baseline) to 16.69%, proving its capability to perform substantive legal reasoning. This work denotes a key progress toward aligning Legal AI with the presumption of innocence.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing digital communication by powering conversational agents deployed across domains such as customer service, digital sales, and insurance. These agents, built on LLMs, can understand user input, retrieve relevant information, and generate coherent responses. However, while they excel at factual communication, they often lack the ability to engage in truly persuasive, context-sensitive dialogue, especially in domains like insurance, where trust and clarity are critical. Building on this need within the insurance domain, our work focuses on improving the persuasiveness of digital agents, aka LLMs. To support this, we introduce InsureDial, a Persuasive Insurance Dialogue dataset, designed to capture the nuances of persuasive communication specific to motor insurance interactions. We introduce PersuaRL, a reinforcement learning-based framework that equips LLM-driven dialogue agents with the ability to adaptively explore, select, and coordinate strategies across multiple expert modules, guided by the evolving dialogue context, to achieve more effective persuasion. We conduct extensive automatic human and qualitative evaluations on two benchmark persuasion dialogue datasets, including our InsureDial. Our evaluations consistently demonstrate that PersuaRL outperforms baseline, generating contextually appropriate and highly persuasive responses.
Social media fact-checking has long been challenged by evidence-level and aggregation-level conflicts, where erroneous evidence mimics authoritative news sources. To capture this challenge and support conflict verification tasks, we present ContraNote, a large-scale real-world dataset curated from X's Community Notes system. It includes 33,686 posts for evaluating evidence-level conflict resolution, and 54,474 instances for evaluating aggregation-level prioritization. Additionally, we propose CoVer, a factual adjudication framework with three-stage pipelines: evidence schema normalization, factual consensus and support verification. This prioritizes evidence over noise to prevent it from compromising the final verdict. Technical evaluations show that CoVer achieves strong performance compared with state-of-the-art baselines across ContraNote (86.0% Acc., 68.0% mac. F1, 64.5 bal. Acc. on Conflict; and 88.5% Acc., 88.5 mac. F1 and 89.2 bal. Acc. on Prioritization), CONFACT-HumC (88.4% Acc.) and CONFACT-ModC (89.4% Acc.).
Emotional labor is the effortful management of emotional displays to meet social or professional expectations. Personality traits have been correlated with emotional labor strategies, yet research on this link relies almost exclusively on self-report scales administered only in occupational settings. We investigate whether large language models injected with psychometrically grounded personas reproduce these personality-driven selection patterns across everyday social scenarios. We construct the first emotional labor strategy dataset of 500 socially situated events, each offering three behavioral choices corresponding to surface acting, deep acting, and genuine expression. We source 50 fictional characters from a large-scale personality repository and profile each through two parallel tracks: observer-rated bipolar adjective composites and in-character self-report items. Five LLMs evaluate all scenarios under both persona conditions. We find that models align more towards deep acting, and that Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability consistently predict this preference. Entropy analysis confirms that persona reliably influences the output and varies across models and emotions.
Robust understanding of user input is a core requirement for voice assistants deployed in real-world environments. In practice, these systems encounter heterogeneous fallback situations caused by noisy audio input, transcription errors, ambiguous requests, incomplete utterances, or unintended activations. Existing systems typically respond with generic fallback messages, which do not resolve the underlying interaction failure and can degrade user experience. We study fallback handling in a deployed smartwatch-based voice assistant for general health support in everyday environments. Our analysis is based on six months of real-world usage data from more than 500 users, yielding a dataset of 3,030 anonymized, naturally occurring fallback-triggering utterances. We contribute (1) an operational taxonomy and the annotated VoxFallbacks dataset of these interactions, (2) a comparative evaluation of different models within a classification pipeline under practical deployment constraints, and (3) practical lessons for designing robust and cost-efficient fallback mechanisms. Results show that lightweight embedding-based classifiers outperform larger generative models on most classification tasks while requiring substantially fewer computational resources.
Positive psychology dialogue aims to support emotional distress and positive resource building, requiring models to produce not only empathetic replies but also coherent progression through a multi-turn support process. Existing resources often reduce supervision to turn-level strategies or holistic preference labels, leaving process position, support function, and local repair targets implicit. We introduce StageWell, a process-aligned Chinese corpus for positive psychology dialogue, together with HQS, a structured protocol for data construction and evaluation. StageWell organizes support into a six-stage support process and uses a multi-agent whole-dialogue rewriting workflow to construct 12,445 SFT instances, 1,849 DPO preference pairs, and a GroundTruth subset of 120 expert-revised dialogues and 977 QA pairs. Guided by HQS, DPO pairs are built as process-localized repairs: flawed model outputs are used as rejected responses, and targeted rewrites under the same context and stage constraint are used as chosen responses. Across four 9B-14B open-source LLMs, this supervision yields robust gains in process control, response quality, and safety. Averaged across models, BERTScore improves by 0.037, Q-Overall increases by 1.32 points, S-exact increases by 0.236, and the H-critical rate decreases by 0.167. These results highlight the value of modeling supportive dialogue as a structured multi-turn support process rather than as single-turn response generation.
Multi-trait Automated Essay Scoring (AES) requires rubric-grounded reasoning across interdependent traits, rather than isolated score prediction. Existing feedback-enhanced methods often decouple feedback from scoring or assess traits independently, weakening score--feedback consistency and rubric alignment. We propose HiFTS, a unified autoregressive framework that generates hierarchical CoT feedback before predicting trait-level and holistic scores. HiFTS distills rubric-grounded hierarchical CoT feedback from a teacher LLM and trains student models to jointly generate feedback and scores. HiFTS further applies Group Relative Policy Optimization with a composite reward balancing score agreement, calibration, feedback quality, and structural validity. At inference, a lightweight global prior provides holistic guidance to reduce drift during long-form reasoning. We also introduce CFMS-34, a Chinese multi-trait AES dataset with 951 essays annotated with holistic scores and 34 rubric-based traits. Experiments on CFMS-34 and ASAP++ show that HiFTS achieves strong holistic and trait-level scoring while producing coherent, rubric-aligned feedback.
Social power plays a fundamental role in shaping human interaction, yet computational studies of power remain limited to narrow linguistic and cultural settings. Existing datasets further lack the demographic and relational depth needed for robust cross-cultural analysis. To address this gap, we introduce a theoretically grounded framework for studying social power in naturalistic multilingual dialogue through movie screenplays. The framework integrates a schema informed by social science theory, a native speaker annotation pipeline refined through pilot studies, and a custom interface for scalable cross-lingual analysis. Using this framework, we constructed an initial corpus containing 15,836 annotated instances from 100 scenes in French and Egyptian Arabic movies. Our analysis reveals strong agreement on observable demographic and contextual attributes, while socially interpretive aspects, such as power asymmetry and intention alignment, remain more contested, highlighting the complexity of social power across cultures. We evaluated 6 Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal LLMs on cross-cultural social power reasoning, finding persistent gaps between human and model agreement in relational and theory-of-mind reasoning. Our work introduces the first extensible multilingual framework for studying social power in dialogues and provides an initial evaluation setting for studying cross-cultural social reasoning.
Influential public discourse shapes public beliefs and can also mislead, not only through what is stated, but also through how information is framed, omitted, contextualised, and communicated. Yet less research has focused on how such misleadingness arises and shapes the interpretations formed by readers. To address this gap, we introduce Reader-Centric Misleadingness Understanding (RCMN), a framework that operationalises misleadingness through five dimensions: misleading mechanism, likely reader interpretation, evidence-warranted interpretation, emotional arousal, and communicative intent. Based on this framework, we construct an evidence-grounded dataset of influential public discourse. Empirical findings show that misleadingness is diverse and extends well beyond fabrication, with unsupported inference, exaggeration, and omission among the prevalent mechanisms, and is frequently associated with heightened emotional arousal and distortive communicative intent. Moreover, we investigate whether lightweight claim-and-context representations retain sufficient cues for understanding reader-centric misleadingness without access to richer contextual, evidential, and multimodal information. Evaluation across five recent generative foundation models shows that reader-level interpretations can often be recovered from such limited representations, whereas identifying how misleadingness is produced remains considerably more challenging. These findings highlight the potential of lightweight representations for scalable misleadingness analysis, while reliable understanding of misleading mechanisms continues to require richer contextual and evidential grounding.
While large language models (LLMs) possess vast zero-shot procedural knowledge, their tendency to produce homogenized logic often obscures the unique, idiosyncratic execution processes of individual human creators. In this paper, we investigate the computational discovery of procedural personas from unstructured data. To achieve this, we introduce ViralRecipesTrans, a new dataset of procedurally aligned execution flow graphs extracted from popular culinary video transcripts and explicitly mapped to specific creators. We formulate procedural stylometry as a graph learning and process discovery task, revealing a fundamental duality: while traditional lexical classifiers overfit via semantic leakage, discrete topological metrics successfully capture the rigid physical constraints of a creator's workflow. Building upon this characterization, we extend our framework into a novel generative task--predicting a creator's exact structural execution graph for unseen dishes. We expose a fundamental dichotomy in style generation between global macro-planning and local structural execution. Our results demonstrate that few-shot LLMs dominate semantic assignment but suffer from persistent macro-planning deficits, whereas our structured two-stage model achieves superior topological control via rigid Markovian priors. Together, an ensemble approach to procedural generation combines the strengths from both sides, dynamically synthesizing global semantic reasoning with localized topological footprints to automate the discovery and generation of personalized workflows.
Counterspeech effectively neutralizes the impact of online hate. Although prior work explores automated counterspeech generation, it largely emphasizes stylistic control while treating hate speech as homogeneous, overlooking that distinct forms of abuse require fundamentally different counterspeech strategies. To address this gap, we introduce FIRE (Factuality Informed Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework) that first decomposes hate speech into one of the five distinct categories (misinformation, stereotype, conspiracy, dehumanizing, non-factual), and then maps it to a targeted counterspeech style. To facilitate FIRE, we curate FactualCS, a novel dataset of $4,784$ instances that provides the annotations regarding hate categories, reasoning traces, and evidence mappings, which are critical elements for grounded generation that are missing in prior work. A comprehensive evaluation across $28$ baseline configurations demonstrates that FIRE significantly surpasses existing methods, despite using compact agents ($<$2B). FIRE achieves a $\sim$ $12 \%$ and $\sim$ $11 \%$ improvements in factual and category-specific accuracy respectively, while simultaneously reducing toxicity by $\sim$ $11 \%$ relative to the strongest baselines. Further human evaluation confirms that responses generated by FIRE are significantly preferred over the strongest baselines, underscoring its effectiveness for real-world deployment. These findings show that decomposing the underlying intent of hate speech is essential for generating safe, effective, and contextually precise counterspeech.
Martin Wessel, Timo Spinde, Jürgen Pfeffer +1cs.CL
Media bias detection relies on definitions and examples that specify what counts as bias, yet these specifications often vary across datasets or remain implicit, even when given the same name. Such variation makes it unclear whether models trained for the same bias category learn the same construct or different phenomena, a problem largely overlooked in prior work. We examine how definition choice affects bias annotation in a between-subjects experiment with 354 participants and a parallel evaluation with four LLMs. Participants and models rate six news articles across four bias categories using definitions that vary in conceptual framing and elaboration. Across 8,496 human and 28,800 LLM ratings, we find that the conceptual target of a definition drives annotation divergence, while construct-preserving elaboration does not: conceptual framing significantly shifts annotations for humans and does so even more strongly for LLMs. We discuss implications for construct specification in annotation protocols and prompt-based measurement, and consider how definitional sensitivity may propagate to downstream classification beyond media bias. We also release MUDD, the Multi-Definition Bias Detection Dataset.
Arabic harmful-language detection has received considerable attention, yet Arabic text detoxification remains underexplored. We introduce AraDetox, a multi-dialect Arabic detoxification dataset comprising 10,500 harmful social-media posts and 84,000 detoxified rewrites generated using GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash across Modern Standard Arabic, Gulf, Levantine, and Egyptian Arabic. The generated outputs were assessed through human evaluation and automatic analyses of lexical change, semantic preservation, sentiment, and dialectal style. Results show that detoxification is primarily a meaning-preserving rewriting task: substantial lexical and structural reformulation is accompanied by consistently high semantic similarity. Human evaluation confirms successful harmful-language removal while largely preserving the original meaning. Dialectal analyses further indicate that the generated variants exhibit measurable stylistic alignment with reference Arabic dialect corpora. Comparison with existing resources highlights two complementary approaches to detoxification: minimal-edit lexical substitution and meaning-preserving reformulation. Our findings demonstrate that large-scale Arabic detoxification resources can be constructed through LLM-assisted generation and human verification. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/ArabicNLP-UK/AraDetox to support future research on Arabic detoxification, safe text generation, and multi-dialect Arabic NLP.
Mohamed Bayan Kmainasi, Ali Ezzat Shahroor, Elisa Sartori +2cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG
Propaganda detection includes several related prediction levels, ranging from sentence-level decisions to technique classification and span identification. However, it remains unclear how supervision at these levels interacts when learned jointly across Arabic and English. We present ProBel, an Arabic and English resource that aligns binary labels, multi-label annotations over 23 propaganda techniques grouped into six coarse categories, technique-labeled spans, and reference explanations for the same news sentences. It includes a substantially larger English collection and supports matched binary, coarse-grained, multi-label, and span-level tasks in both languages. We evaluate zero-shot prompting, task-specific fine-tuning, and joint training under a shared setup. A single bilingual multi-task model achieves the best overall performance and remains competitive across tasks and languages. Cross-task analysis shows that transfer depends on the supervision level. Joint classification training preserves binary performance, whereas span-only training can weaken sentence-level prediction. Joint bilingual training yields the most stable results, while monolingual fine-tuning can reduce transfer to the other language. We will release the data, code, and evaluation scripts.
AI tools increasingly support tasks across the scientific research cycle, from experiment design and manuscript preparation to peer review. At the same time, the continuing growth in conference submissions has increased the burden on meta-reviewers, who must synthesize reviewer feedback, author rebuttals, and manuscript revisions. To address this concern, this paper introduces Metag, a dataset to accelerate the development of meta-reviewing agents, specifically to identify changes made to scientific articles during the review-rebuttal process. Each instance contains a reviewer concern, the author's proposed resolution, and the manuscript diffs implementing the stated change. Metag is collected by obtaining manuscript versions from before the review deadline and after acceptance, computing differences between the two documents, and asking human annotators to align these differences with action items from OpenReview discussions. The resulting dataset consists of 349 high-quality action items tied to paper differences and will enable building methods to empower meta reviewers to quickly identify whether authors have addressed reviewer statements and where in the paper those changes have been made, resulting in additional transparency and traceability throughout peer review. The dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/Metag-dataset.
Matteo Cargnelutti, Catherine Brobston, Eben English +6cs.CL cs.DL
Historical newspapers are an abundant record of public life, but their dense, irregular and sometimes noisy layouts make computational access to these materials both challenging and limited. We present the Institutional Newspapers Pipeline, a modular system we jointly designed with Boston Public Library to extract high-quality, structured datasets from historical newspaper scans. It was architected so that each step remains interpretable and customizable, and so that the pipeline as a whole remains computationally frugal enough to run on workstation-level hardware. The pipeline runs each scan through a multi-step process: it segments scans into individual type-agnostic crops and performs OCR on each resulting segment before then performing text analysis, type classification, reading order detection, named entities recognition, subject classification, language detection, and pre-computed embeddings generation on every crop. We ran this pipeline against a portion of Boston Public Library's holdings and released the results as an open dataset. The optical character recognition (OCR) output represents 16.3 billion o200k_base tokens across 83.1 million individual crops, extracted from 1,473,635 public domain newspaper scans published between 1795 and 1930. This report describes our methods for each processing step, the small models we trained, as well as the evaluation results and dataset-scale measurements we collected in the process. It accompanies the release of the pipeline, models, and dataset. We position this work as a substantial step towards unlocking high-quality data from tens of millions of newspaper scans.
Storyboards turn screenplays into visual shot plans for automated short drama production. Professional storyboarding relies on tacit directorial expertise and remains an industrial bottleneck. Large language models can automate this step, but methods for supplying directing knowledge face three challenges: (1) Knowledge acquisition: the craft remains implicit in exemplars or must be written manually. (2) Knowledge refinement: authored knowledge is not evaluated against execution outcomes, and opaque generation prevents feedback attribution to the knowledge behind each decision. (3) Knowledge injection: injecting all knowledge exceeds usable context, while manual selection for every narrative group does not scale. We present SAGE (Skill with Attribution-Guided Evolution), a deployed framework that learns, attributes, evolves, and routes directing knowledge from expert demonstrations. SAGE derives rules that are independent of episode content by contrasting each training screenplay with its expert storyboard. During generation, the model records each narrative group's adopted rules. Combining these records with localized feedback enables targeted updates to individual rules. Evolved rules form scenario packages with a routing index, so each group retrieves only a bounded set appropriate to its situation without expert intervention. On 18 test episodes across three genres, SAGE scored 77.8 on a rubric validated by experts, versus 77.1 for professional directors. Deployed for 14 days on Virtual Film Studio, SAGE produced 1,344 narrative group outputs; 87.2 percent were accepted without substantive edits, and the production team recorded over 83 percent less authoring time per episode. We release PROSE, the first public dataset pairing screenplays with storyboards by professional directors across 68 episodes: https://github.com/creDreams/PROSE.
Rebecca M. M. Hicke, Sil Hamilton, David Mimno +1cs.CL
Works of literature are complicated; they balance plot, suspense, surprise, and artistic expression. Summaries of literature prioritize plot, and therefore may deviate from their sources. Using a combination of manual and LLM-based annotation, we construct a dataset mapping sentences from 150 novel summaries to their respective source chapters. We find the task unexpectedly difficult for both human and model annotators. Using the sentence-to-chapter mappings, we then measure summary linearity, the degree to which it maintains the source's order of events, and uniformity, the degree to which a summary spreads attention equally across a source. By examining when and how summaries break linearity and uniformity, we identify differences in how literary works and summaries express plot, particularly with regard to the clarity and prominence with which narrative details are described.
Victoria Basmov, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfatycs.CL
The behavior of contemporary generative Large Language Models (LLMs) is directly shaped by prompts, unstructured texts that describe the desired output and model behavior. In this paper we argue that prompts are linguistic objects that merit investigation in their own right. To this end, we collect 57.5K unique samples of prompts from GitHub. Specifically, we focus on transactional prompts: reproducible natural language instructions that are integrated into software. To enable the empirical, quantitative study of prompts, we introduce a structured ontology, capturing the properties of prompts as well as their formal and semantic components. Based on this ontology, we transform prompts from unstructured raw texts into richly structured linguistic objects. Analysis of these structured data reveals significant diversity of usage patterns across languages, domains, tasks, and modalities, in a typical Zipf-like distribution where some clearly prevail and others, more diverse, appear in the long tail. To validate the reliability of the ontology-based annotation of the prompts, we perform a comprehensive error analysis across all fields, providing a detailed assessment of annotation quality. We release the dataset together with a browsing and exploration interface (https://github.com/OnlpLab/transactionalPromptsCollection ).
This paper introduces ViTOED, a novel dataset for target-oriented emotion detection in Vietnamese social media texts. The ViTOED comprises 10,985 user comments and 21,244 manually annotated opinion quadruples (source, target, expression, polarity) that follow strict guidelines. The dataset reveals Vietnamese-specific phenomena, such as implicit sources and targets and vocabulary ambiguities, enabling deeper analysis of user emotions toward entities. We propose a baseline using structured sentiment graphs and evaluate various Vietnamese pre-trained language models. The empirical results highlight challenges in span detection and relation extraction and indicate substantial room for model improvement in Vietnamese Target-Oriented Emotion Detection tasks.
Regional dialectal variation poses a fundamental challenge to natural language processing (NLP) in Bangla, where over 240 million speakers communicate across diverse regional variants that diverge significantly from Standard Colloquial Bangla (SCB) in phonology, morphology, and lexicon. Contemporary neural machine trans- lation (NMT) architectures and large language models (LLMs) predominantly as- sume a homogeneous language distribution, resulting in severe performance degra- dation when translating low-resource regional dialects. In this work, we present a unified Poly-Dialectal Neural Machine Translation System capable of multi-directional translation across 12 Bangla regional dialects without routing through an inter- mediary standard pivot. We compile the largest multi-dialect parallel corpus for Bangla to date, comprising 51,531 non-null parallel sentence pairs across 12 di- alects, incorporating 2,500 expert-verified, bidirectional parallel sentence pairs for five previously unaddressed dialects. Evaluating sequence-to-sequence architec- tures under Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptation (DoRA), our fine-tuned BanglaT5 model achieves state-of-the-art translation performance (29.26 BLEU, 57.26 chrF++), outperforming NLLB-200 (615M) and mBART-50 (611M) while preserving morphological coherence. Furthermore, we conduct a systematic cross- dialectal transfer analysis and dataset scaling study, establishing empirical thresh- olds for low-resource dialect adaptation. Finally, we deploy the optimized INT8- quantized model as an open-access web application to promote digital inclusion for marginalized dialect communities. The complete dataset is publicly available at Mendeley Data (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/v9cf66fk2t/2).
Shirlene Rose Bandela, Karan Bindal, Vaibhav Garg +1cs.CL
Online communities increasingly provide spaces where survivors of sexual violence can share their experiences and seek support. Although prior research has examined stigma and social support separately, less is known about how stigma expressed in survivor narratives relates to the support offered in response. We introduce the SCOPE dataset, linking stigma signals in online survivor narratives to support types in corresponding comment threads. We annotate posts using a multi-dimensional stigma taxonomy, including Experienced, Internalized, Anticipated, and Structural Stigma, and comments using a support taxonomy encompassing Information Support, Emotional Support, Esteem Support, Tangible Assistance, and Group Interaction. Using contextual, linguistic, and emotion analyses, we compare Stigma and No Stigma content and find that Stigma narratives place greater emphasis on internalized distress, whereas No Stigma narratives focus more on interpreting situations and experiences. Internalized Stigma is the most prevalent category, and community responses remain broadly stable across stigma types, with Information and Esteem Support appearing most often. These findings show how stigma shapes survivor narratives and peer responses and have implications for computational modeling, content moderation, and safer online systems.
Chen Lyu, Xingwei Tan, Simon Cullen +4cs.CL cs.AI cs.LG
Synthetic dialogue generation offers a way to study conversational dynamics in sensitive domains where real data are difficult to access, release, or annotate. The underlying abuse may occur online or offline: threats and coercion can appear directly in messages, while behaviours such as surveillance, isolation, stalking, and physical violence may be planned, disclosed, or referred to conversationally. Privacy and legal constraints make it difficult the release of large-scale real conversation datasets; existing work has mostly focused on sentence-level toxicity of online abuses, leaving a gap in modelling abuse as a relational and temporally unfolding phenomenon. In this work, we focus on modelling Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) scenarios as multi-turn dialogues. We introduce ConVAWG, a retrieval-grounded framework for generating CPS-aligned synthetic VAWG chat dialogues. ConVAWG builds scenarios from persona seeds, demographic patterns reported by the UK Office for National Statistics, official crime definitions, and retrieved Domestic Homicide Review cases; converts them into hierarchical event timelines; generates multi-scene role-play dialogues; and applies targeted activation-steered toxicity control to appropriate utterances. We release over 6,000 multi-turn dialogue events across 200 scenarios with rich scenario-, event-, and turn-level metadata. Extensive human evaluation, LLM-as-Judge assessment, ablations, and downstream tasks show strong dialogue quality and domain fidelity.
Legal Statute Prediction (LSP) involves automatically identifying relevant legal statutes given factual descriptions in legal documents, typically framed as a multi-label classification task within natural language processing and information retrieval research. While recent advances have begun incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) for statute prediction, current approaches primarily focus on accuracy metrics without addressing the critical need for legal reasoning, a fundamental requirement in judicial contexts where decisions must be explainable and justifiable. To address this research gap, we present PROSLEX (PRediction Of Statutes and LEgal eXplanation), a comprehensive dataset comprising 1,623 expert-annotated legal documents from the Indian context. Each document is paired with statute predictions and detailed explanations, totaling 7,450 explanations, capturing the underlying legal reasoning. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluate various prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, and tree-of-thoughts approaches, to generate both statute predictions and their corresponding legal rationales. Our evaluation framework measures not only predictive performance but also the coherence and legal validity of generated explanations, positioning PROSLEX as a benchmark for developing explainable AI systems that can support legal practitioners while advancing research in interpretable legal NLP. To ensure reproducibility, we have made our PROSLEX dataset and model code available on GitHub: https://github.com/subinay494/Legal_Statute_Prediction_Explanation.
Collaborative dialogue can end with apparent agreement while participants still differ on goals, assumptions, or execution plans, creating an \textbf{illusion of alignment (IoA)}. A real-user study across 18 meetings confirms that IoA arises routinely in human collaboration. Yet IoA poses a paradox: if participants were aware of such disagreements, they would already be explicit; if not, they cannot articulate them when asked, leaving IoA invisible to both participants and observers. In this work, we make IoA detectable by generating diagnostic multiple-choice questions whose divergent answers across participants provide direct behavioral evidence of hidden disagreement. We construct \textbf{IoA-Suite}, a dataset and evaluation protocol for detecting hidden disagreement, spanning five task types and six domains. We find that even the best model attains only 49.5\% F1, with the bottleneck traced to private context that the dialogue does not surface. We then train \textbf{IoA-Prober-8B} based on IoA-Suite, reaching 51.8\% F1 on IoA-Suite. Across the aforementioned 18 real meetings, it surfaces 2.89 hidden disagreements per meeting that participants confirm they had not voiced, transferring to live human dialogue. Further, in multi-agent collaboration, pairing IoA-Prober-8B with LLM agents improves downstream task performance on BigCodeBench-Hard and HiddenBench.
Marie Escribe, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Amal Haddad Haddad +2cs.CL
Post-Editing (PE) of Machine Translation (MT) output often involves repeating the same lexical and terminological corrections across many segments, especially in specialised and highly repetitive documents. Despite substantial work on Automatic Post-Editing (APE), most available corpora operate at the sentence level, others are synthetic, and overall not designed to study how corrections propagate in realistic Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) workflows. This paper presents the APEX-VW (Automatic Post-Editing eXperiments on Virtual Wards) Corpus, a new open English-Spanish (EN-ES) dataset built from recent NHS virtual-ward documents and professional PE in Trados Studio, with controlled MT, terminology, and quality assurance settings. The corpus contains seven document-coherent source texts totalling 42k words, translated with four MT systems representing different paradigms and then post-edited by professional translators. Unlike prior resources such as WMT APE corpora, eSCAPE, MLQE-PE, or LangMark, the dataset preserves document order and CAT-tool context, making it suitable for research on terminology normalisation, correction propagation, and human-in-the-loop translation support. The paper describes the corpus design, data preparation, PE setup, and initial corpus statistics, and positions the resource as a benchmark for document-level APE and propagation-aware assistive tools.
Construction accident narratives contain rich causal information, but the evidence is often implicit, long-span, and distributed. We introduce ConstructCIE, a manually annotated dataset for Causal Information Extraction from OSHA construction accident reports. The dataset uses a hierarchical schema for accident types, causal factors, sub-causal factors, and supporting evidence spans. We evaluate supervised sequence taggers and instruction-tuned LLMs in an end-to-end hierarchical extraction setting. Results show that most evaluated models achieve strong accident-type prediction and recover broad causal meaning but remain limited in precise span-level extraction. Joint Hierarchical Extraction generally achieves stronger exact and soft matching, while Individual Hierarchical Extraction sometimes achieves higher keyword F1. Error distributions vary by extraction strategy, but evidence-selection and span-boundary errors remain common. These findings show that reliable Causal Information Extraction for construction accidents requires stronger domain grounding and more accurate evidence extraction. The code and data can be found at https://github.com/lab-flair/ConstructCIE .
Despite its cultural relevance and diffusion, queer slang remains underrepresented in Natural Language Processing research. Towards addressing this gap, we introduce Slang-Q, a manually curated dataset of naturally user-generated English sentences paired with queer slang terms and reference definitions, built upon a newly constructed taxonomy of 118 queer terms. We use this resource to conduct a first exploratory evaluation of language models on their ability to understand and define queer slang under varying prompting conditions. Slang-Q is intended as a basis for studying how current models handle sensitive, community-specific language and whether they can provide accurate and reliable information about such forms of identity and linguistic expression.