Jiaqi Wang, Zhou Fang, Qiongfeng Shi +1cs.RO cs.CV
Pretrained Vision-Language-Action models provide a strong foundation for robot learning, but sequentially adapting them to diverse skills can perturb the representations and velocity mappings used by previous skills, leading to catastrophic forgetting. Architecture-based approaches improve retention by isolating skills but lead to increased inference footprint. Recent subspace-constrained methods restrict parameter updates in an orthogonal subspace to minimize interference but impose a unified constraint on the entire model. We analyze the distinct roles of internal VLA components and identify two VLA-specific challenges. First, the VLM maintains broad semantic representations, making it vulnerable to capacity exhaustion, whereas the ActionHead refines semantics into localized velocity patterns that are highly sensitive to perturbations. Second, the final velocity decoder serves as a readout layer. Freezing it forms an output-stage expressivity bottleneck, while updating it risks overwriting previous velocity mappings. To this end, we propose OrthoSkillVLA, a parameter-efficient framework for continual skill learning in pretrained VLA models without demonstration replay. Given the representation heterogeneity, we impose separate subspace constraints on the VLM and ActionHead, preserving reusable semantic capacity while protecting localized velocity patterns. For the output layer, we introduce a lightweight feature-aware MoE decoder, where each skill is allocated a compact expert and a training-free router selects the expert according to feature-space affinity. Extensive simulated and real-world evaluations, together with ablations, demonstrate that OrthoSkillVLA better preserves prior skills while acquiring new ones.
Autonomous highway overtaking demands foresighted decision-making to handle complex interactions, stochastic traffic evolution, and temporal risk accumulation. However, standard safe reinforcement learning approaches typically rely on implicit value-based risk estimations rather than explicit dynamics modeling, thereby struggling to accurately capture complex risk propagation over multi-step horizons. This limitation frequently results in behaviors that are locally safe but induce substantial latent risks in the long term. To address this, a World Model-based Risk-aware Mixture-of-Experts (WM-RMoE) framework is proposed. First, a learned latent dynamics model facilitates parallel multi-step rollouts, elevating safety assessment from the action level to the trajectory level via cumulative risk evaluation. Second, to enhance robustness under varying interaction intensities, a hierarchical gating mechanism dynamically coordinates experts across long-horizon, short-horizon, and rule-based safety modules. Furthermore, a Gaussian Mixture Model is integrated to preserve multimodal maneuvering branches, thereby mitigating the issue of behavioral mode averaging. Experimental results demonstrate that WM-RMoE significantly outperforms representative baselines in terms of safety compliance, decision stability, and generalization capability. Furthermore, benefiting from the risk-aware formulation, the proposed framework uniquely exhibits the ability to generate foresighted and semantically distinct overtaking maneuvers across diverse traffic densities.
JEPA world models predict the next latent state with a single deterministic predictor trained by latent regression. We show that this fails structurally when the environment is stochastic: at a branching transition, the regression-optimal predictor outputs the conditional mean of the successor embeddings, a point between the true next states that corresponds to no state at all. We prove this collapse for deterministic and gated mixture-of-experts predictors, and prove that MoP-JEPA's hard-assigned predictors converge instead to a quantizer of the transition distribution: one head per successor mode, enumerable in a single forward pass, which is the interface a planner consumes. On official OGBench offline data with leak-free evaluation, planning over single-predictor rollouts performs poorly ($0.02$--$0.09$ success) while planning over our predicted modes reaches up to $0.85$, ahead of deterministic, gated-MoE, and variational predictors on every task. Because multi-prediction evaluation invites coverage freeloading, a verification protocol is part of the method: an input-agnostic codebook control, a shuffled-context test, router-gated readouts, transition-precision guards, and a verified-route criterion in which the model proposes its transition graph blind and ground truth is used only to check the result. Under this criterion our method outperforms the strongest soft alternative on all three mazes ($2$--$5\times$), and the protocol identifies the remaining gap in that baseline's raw scores as routes through predicted transitions that do not exist. The same model executes in the real environment, placing second of seven against the published OGBench baselines on the hardest maze. Multimodal dynamics decide whether a JEPA world model can plan at all; a mixture of predictors with hard assignment is a minimal and verifiable fix.