How Should I Pick a Foundation Model for My Robot? In Favor of a Community Evaluation Framework for Social Robots

Researchers who seek to build social robot applications on foundation models are faced with a difficult question: how should we pick a model? Public leaderboards offer little guidance: the demands of real-time, embodied social interaction lie largely outside their focus. And direct evaluation is impractical at scale: each embodied study requires scarce participant, robot, and experimenter time. In this paper, we identify five evaluation dimensions for foundation models in social robots: (i) conversational competence, (ii) user safety, (iii) embodied character, (iv) target scene effectiveness, and (v) audience appropriateness. To make model selection cheaper and better informed, we propose a three-tiered evaluation funnel paradigm that first filters with general metrics, then extends to simulated interactions, and terminates in more expensive, robot-specific evaluation. We map all five dimensions across all three tiers, chart where applicable evaluation methods exist and are missing, and close with a call to action: let's build the evaluation framework together as a community.

Fast and Accurate: An Adaptive VLA Inference Framework through Environment-aware Model Selection

Embodied intelligence demands both long-horizon reasoning and real-time closed-loop responsiveness. Recent dual-system Vision-Language-Action (VLA) architectures combine fast reactive control with slow deliberative reasoning to balance inference speed and task success rate. However, existing dual-process VLAs tightly couple the fast module to intermediate representations of the slow module, necessitating end-to-end joint training and limiting modularity, extensibility and flexible system switching. In this paper, we propose Environment-aware Model Selection (EMS), an adaptive VLA inference framework that switches between two fully decoupled systems of different scales through environment-aware model selection. The large-scale deliberative system provides globally consistent trajectory planning to ensure task success, while a lightweight reactive system enables high-frequency closed-loop control. A reinforcement-learning-based switching policy dynamically selects which system to invoke based on real-time feedback, enabling sparse use of the slow system and thereby balancing pretrained knowledge utilisation with runtime efficiency. Our design offers three key advantages over prior hierarchical VLA frameworks: (1) a fully decoupled and modular dual-system architecture that supports plug-and-play model replacement; (2) an adaptive, environment-aware switching strategy; (3) high-frequency inference for responsive closed-loop control. We extensively evaluate EMS in both simulation and real-world environments. On the LIBERO benchmark, EMS achieves success rates comparable to the large-scale baseline while increasing the effective action frequency to 93.4 Hz. The framework further demonstrates strong extensibility in real-world dual-arm manipulation tasks, where it accelerates task completion while maintaining robust performance.