Auditing Instruction-Trajectory Mismatches in Multimodal Robot Demonstrations

Robot demonstration datasets used to train vision-language-action policies can contain a subtle but harmful failure mode: trajectories that are behaviorally correct but paired with the wrong language instruction. We study post-hoc auditing of these Instruction-Trajectory Mismatches (ITMs). Unlike failed rollouts, ITMs often look plausible, and can corrupt the language-behavior mapping learned by the policy. We propose Multimodal Probabilistic Fusion (MMPF), a training-free auditing framework that treats each modality as an expert, estimates a task-label distribution from local neighborhood agreement and global prototype similarity, and then fuses modalities with predictive-entropy weighting in a product of experts. Across LIBERO benchmarks with injected instruction mismatches and noisy real-robot data, MMPF achieves the strongest overall ITM detection and label correction accuracy. We also show that auditing improves most downstream policy learning in settings where language is needed to disambiguate the task. We demonstrate in real robot experiments that our method can achieve improved policy performance and show the trade-off of filtering demonstrations compared to relabeling.

SPARC: Reliable Spatial Annotations from Robot Demonstrations at Scale

This work introduces Spatial Annotations from Robot Demonstrations with Reliability Calibration (SPARC), a risk-aware framework that automatically labels robot demonstrations with structured spatial annotations and assigns each annotation a reliability score. Structured spatial annotations, such as bounding boxes, object trajectories, and manipulation phase labels, benefit a broad range of robotics applications from training grounded robot policies and embodied foundation models to motion planning and hierarchical task composition. Existing automated pipelines generate such annotations at scale but provide no reliable quality signal: detector confidence is poorly calibrated for annotation correctness, forcing a choice between accepting noisy labels or discarding useful samples. In contrast to existing automated pipelines, SPARC leverages the spatio-temporal structure inherent to robot tasks to generate a reliability signal, reducing noisy labels and retaining more useful samples. We further introduce Interaction-Aware Bench (IA-Bench), a benchmark that measures model accuracy in grounding the locations of interacted objects in robot demonstrations. On 1.7k human-annotated demonstrations spanning diverse embodiments and scenarios, SPARC significantly outperforms detection-only baselines in localization accuracy while retaining three times more samples at high-precision operating points. Our experiments demonstrate that models finetuned on our annotations achieve state-of-the-art results on object-grounding and pointing benchmarks among similarly sized models, while remaining competitive on broader spatial-reasoning suites without manually verified or annotated training data. Furthermore, policies trained on SPARC-generated annotations outperform baselines in cluttered, visually ambiguous real-world scenes. Code, data, and models are available at intuitive-robots.github.io/sparc-labeling.