DonorRank: Donor Language Selection for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Speech Recognition

Low-resource automatic speech recognition (ASR) commonly relies on cross-lingual transfer, where models are adapted from higher-resource donor languages. However, selecting donors remains challenging for spontaneous speech from under-resourced language communities, due to linguistic variation, evolving orthographic conventions, and uneven resource availability. We present DonorRank, a learning-to-rank framework for predicting effective donor languages for zero-shot ASR. We evaluate DonorRank on two multilingual speech corpora of Indic and African language families. It accurately predicts donor language rankings and improves donor selection over common heuristics based on genetic similarity or high-resource languages. Beyond improving transfer, we show how DonorRank is a general framework for analyzing donor language selection itself. Our analyses show that the composition of the donor set determines which linguistic cues are useful in predicting successful transfer. We also identify transfer patterns that provide practical guidance for multilingual ASR in low-resource settings.

The Learning Objective Governs Perceptual Narrowing: A Cross-Lingual, Layer-Wise, Ten-Seed Study of Self-Supervised Speech Encoders

Perceptual narrowing---the developmental loss of non-native phoneme discrimination in the first year of life \citep{werker1984}---is a canonical developmental finding, yet \emph{what learning objective produces it} remains open. We train a \(\sim\)7\,M-parameter Transformer encoder on child-directed and read speech and evaluate phoneme ABX in English, French, and Mandarin over ten seeds, the seed as the unit of replication. Six results. \textbf{(1)}~The objective sets the direction of cross-lingual transfer: reconstruction (masked mel-prediction) degrades non-native discrimination, prediction (frame-contrastive) improves it---a same-encoder, same-data gap of \(+0.051\) in first-layer Mandarin ABX (\(p=3\times10^{-8}\)), unanimous in sign across twenty runs. \textbf{(2)}~That decline combines a large arm-intrinsic difficulty gradient with a smaller language-specialization effect (matched vs.\ mismatched \(+0.022\), \(p=10^{-4}\), all four layers). \textbf{(3)}~Against a language-symmetric raw-mel floor, reconstruction pushes the first layer \emph{below} the discriminability of its input; prediction pushes it \emph{above}. \textbf{(4)}~Read speech gives a \(3.6\times\) steeper non-native decline than child-directed speech. \textbf{(5)}~The customary three-seed budget cannot see this reliably: an effect unambiguous at ten seeds is called significant by as few as 70\% of three-seed subsets. \textbf{(6)}~Six objective configurations---sharpening, compression, consolidation, their composition, and word-level semantic grounding in two forms---fail to produce the full developmental signature (native improves \emph{and} non-native declines): a single objective moves both languages the same way because it acts on a shared representation. We conclude that the objective, not the architecture, is the first-order determinant of narrowing-shaped representational change.

Synthetic Speech, Real Signal: Paralinguistic Preservation and Cross-Lingual Augmentation via Voice Cloning

Synthetic data augmentation in speech is common practice for linguistic tasks like ASR, but has seen far less work for paralinguistic ones, especially clinical tasks where labelled data is expensive and some patient groups are underrepresented. Voice cloning is one such augmentation approach, but is typically evaluated on speech intelligibility (WER) or speaker similarity (SS) rather than on downstream performance, and it remains unclear whether these preserve the paralinguistic signal such tasks depend on. We benchmark eight voice cloning models on five paralinguistic tasks across public and clinical datasets, showing most preserve signal with modest degradation. We then clone English clinical speech into Japanese and find that training on cloned data outperforms raw cross-lingual transfer for depression and anxiety detection on real Japanese speech, suggesting voice cloning is a promising direction for augmenting clinical speech data in low-resource languages.

Which Languages Transfer Best to Warlpiri? A Similarity-Based Study for Low-Resource ASR

This paper investigates how language similarity can improve cross-lingual transfer for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in extremely low-resource settings. Warlpiri, an Australian Aboriginal language, has very limited transcribed speech data, making transfer learning essential. We propose a framework combining acoustic similarity from pre-trained speech models with linguistic similarity based on typology, phoneme inventories, grammatical, and syntactic features to rank high-resource source languages and evaluate their effectiveness for ASR transfer to Warlpiri. Experiments with Whisper show that acoustically and typologically similar languages outperform monolingual and multilingual baselines. Assamese and Hindi achieve substantial reductions in word and character error rates. Correlation analysis further indicates that acoustic similarity is the strongest predictor of fine-tuning performance, while phoneme inventory and typological similarity better explain zero-shot transfer.

From Sinhala to Dhivehi: Cross-Lingual Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Speech Recognition

Dhivehi, the national language of the Maldives, is currently under-resourced for automatic speech recognition (ASR) and other NLP tasks. This study investigates whether cross-lingual transfer learning from Sinhala, a linguistically related, relatively well-resourced Insular Indo-Aryan language, can improve Dhivehi ASR. We conduct seventeen experiments across five transfer learning paradigms: Dhivehi-only baselines, sequential fine-tuning, multilingual fine-tuning, continual pre-training, and a control using Turkish as an unrelated language. The strongest system, continual pre-training on Sinhala followed by fine-tuning on Dhivehi with KenLM, achieves 12.89% WER and 2.70% CER, outperforming the Dhivehi-only baseline by 13.50% WER and 3.02% CER. However, the adaptation strategy and decoding configuration are equally critical for a successful transfer learning experiment. We conduct seventeen controlled experiments spanning five transfer learning paradigms: Dhivehi-only baselines, sequential fine-tuning, multilingual fine-tuning, continual pre-training, and a control experiment using Turkish as an unrelated language. The strongest system, continual pre-training on Sinhala followed by fine-tuning on Dhivehi with KenLM, achieves 12.89% WER and 2.70% CER, outperforming the Dhivehi-only baseline by 13.50% WER and 3.02% CER. The Turkish control experiment confirms that observed improvements stem from linguistic relatedness; adaptation strategy and decoding configuration are also critical.

Evaluating the Effect of Linguistic Relatedness on Cross-Lingual Transfer in Large Multilingual Automatic Speech Recognition

Extending automatic speech recognition (ASR) to low-resource African languages is constrained by the prohibitive demands of data collection at scale. A promising direction is to leverage linguistic relatedness to enhance cross-lingual transfer from a related auxiliary language to the low-resource target by sequentially adapting on both. Although this strategy has shown meaningful improvements in small ASR models, its effectiveness in large ASR remains unclear. We extend this framework to large multilingual ASR through a systematic controlled experimental design spanning six factors, two Africa-centric corpora, and four large ASR models, isolating whether linguistic relatedness reliably predicts cross-lingual transfer gains in this setting. Across all conditions, pre-adaptation on related auxiliary languages yields no practically meaningful transfer improvements given minimal target-language data, suggesting that linguistic relatedness alone may not reliably predict cross-lingual transfer gains in large multilingual ASR, or constitute an effective strategy for extending such models to low-resource languages.

Data Scale, Not Latency, Shapes Cross-Lingual Encoder Transfer in Streaming ASR

Adapting a streaming speech recognition model to a new language requires choosing between two plausible warm starts: a multilingual (ML) encoder or an English-only (EN) encoder. The common intuition is that the multilingual encoder should help most at low data, but it is unclear how long that advantage persists, whether tight streaming latency amplifies it, and whether it survives deployment quantization. We answer these questions with a controlled sweep of a 0.6 B-parameter cache-aware FastConformer transducer across eight European languages, up to five target-language data scales (100 h to 2500 h), three streaming tiers plus offline decoding, and up to four public test sets. The main result is that multilingual initialization is a data-limited advantage, not a latency-limited one. On FLEURS at 160 ms, the mean EN-ML word error rate (WER) gap falls from +4.21 percentage points (pp) at 100 h to +0.20 pp at 2500 h; a power-law fit summarizes this decay, with each doubling of target-language data roughly halving the remaining advantage. Across the three streaming tiers, the across-language mean EN-ML gap is approximately stable at each scale from 100 to 1000 h, and is near zero by 2500 h. Finally, 4-bit weight-only encoder quantization at the matched 560 ms streaming tier reduces the encoder footprint by about 3x, with an average FLEURS WER increase of about 0.5 pp. The resulting guideline is simple: use multilingual initialization in low-data regimes, treat the choice as effectively irrelevant at large data, and make latency and quantization decisions independently.

Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Classification for Dysarthria Severity Assessment

Automatic dysarthria severity assessment is limited by the scarcity of labeled pathological speech data. To address this, we propose Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Classification (CRAC), which leverages speech from a different language via an align-retrieve-fuse pipeline. Supervised contrastive learning first shapes a severity-focused embedding space, then a vector database is built from the opposite-language corpus. During both training and inference, the classifier retrieves top-k references from the aligned space and fuses them with the input via cross-attention. Evaluated on Korean post-stroke and Italian ALS dysarthria datasets under a speaker-independent three-class protocol, CRAC achieves balanced accuracies of 87.3% on Korean and 86.7% on Italian, improving over monolingual baselines by 8.4 and 20.0 percentage points, respectively.