Tabular foundation models for non-tabular tasks

Tabular foundation models (TFMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for machine learning on tabular data, offering the ability to generalize across datasets without task-specific training. Since many machine learning datasets can be represented as tables, this raises the question: does TFM capability extend beyond tasks traditionally regarded as tabular? We address this question by using TabPFN v3 on three non-tabular classification problems: handwritten digit recognition on MNIST, language identification of French and German words, and image classification on Tiny ImageNet. In each case, the original data are represented as rows of a table and classification is formulated as prediction of a missing label. We evaluate performance as a function of the number of context samples provided to the pretrained model, with no additional training or fine-tuning. Despite having no explicit access to the spatial or sequential structure characterizing the data, TabPFN v3 in some cases achieves accuracies comparable with that of models or methods geared specifically toward the corresponding tasks.

Pseudorandom Streams within Diffusion Models Act as Learnable Inputs That Affect Generation Quality

Diffusion models rely on stochastic inputs, yet on finite-precision hardware, the "randomness" they consume is realized as deterministic numerical orbits generated by pseudorandom rules. Accessible orbit structure can become a learnable input and affect both training and generation because the realized loss and its gradient depend on the concrete pseudorandom values consumed at each optimization step. A small multilayer perceptron predicts the next value of an orbit from its recent history, measuring general sequence predictability. A diffusion probe replaces real images with online random tensors while preserving the diffusion architecture and training objective, measuring whether the target system can exploit orbit structure. After controlling marginal statistics and screening out clear dynamical and finite-precision failures, the remaining orbits still produce markedly different diffusion losses and generation quality on MNIST and CIFAR-10. Both measures show strong rank correlations with macroscopic generation degradation, although their local rankings differ. After normalization by the IID baseline, the probe loss and the real-data diffusion loss approximately follow an empirical power law, with different exponents on the two datasets. These results suggest that a pseudorandom source is not only a distributional choice, but also a model-dependent structured input.

Conditioned Direct Feedback Alignment via Activity and Error Geometry

Direct feedback alignment (DFA) trains hidden layers with fixed random projections of the output error, avoiding the transposed-weight backward pass of backpropagation (BP). We study a failure mode of DFA training that is distinct from feedback quality: the local weight update is calculated by an outer product, so anisotropy can enter through either its presynaptic-activity factor or its local-error factor. Our analyses with controlled synthetic regimes isolate the first failure mode and show an approximately 40-percentage-point activity-conditioning gain when high-variance directions contain task-irrelevant nuisance. Three clean confirmations isolate a different regime: error conditioning improves raw DFA by 1.77--7.53 percentage points, and combining independently selected activity and error factors adds 0.40--0.90 points over activity conditioning. The signs hold for tanh/one-vs-rest MNIST and preregistered Fashion-MNIST, and replicate on eight fresh seeds in a ReLU/softmax MNIST model. This factorization yields a symmetric block-local family of normalized DFA (nDFA): activity nDFA right-preconditions by an inverse activity second moment, error nDFA left-preconditions by an inverse local-error second moment, and K-nDFA applies both factors with separately tuned damping. A linearized post-alignment calculation gives an exact input-side spectral identity and a Kronecker-factor motivation for the two-sided rule, whereas norm matching rules out a scalar step-size explanation. The error factor is fragile when under-damped, BatchNorm is a strong activity-side alternative, and convnet gains remain partial. We therefore frame conditioned DFA as a factor-level study of when local outer-product rules fail, not as a general replacement for BP or a solution to all-layer convolutional credit assignment.