Conditional Independence Tests for Constraint-Based Causal Discovery: A Survey

Conditional Independence (CI) tests are the statistical engine of constraint-based causal discovery: in algorithms such as PC (Peter-Clark) and FCI (Fast Causal Inference), skeleton pruning and key orientations follow directly from CI decisions. This survey reviews CI testing with emphasis on assumptions, robustness, and scalability in high-dimensional and mixed-type settings common in biomedical domains. The survey organizes widely used CI methods into six families: partial-correlation, contingency-table, regression, nearest-neighbor, kernel, and machine-learning-based. Special emphasis is provided on the robustness layers that address the limitations of these families. For each family, the survey examines when CI decisions reflect the data-generating distribution and when they fail. By this, we link test-level properties, including power decay with conditioning set size and asymmetric type I/II error consequences, to graph-level errors in skeleton recovery and v-structure orientation. The survey also compares adoption across major R and Python libraries and summarizes open challenges, including mixed-type CI testing without discretization, small-sample error control, and strategies for improving scalability of CI-testing.

Distance Profile Embedding for Independence and Conditional Independence Testing of Random Objects

Testing independence or conditional independence is fundamental to statistical inference, yet existing methods for non-Euclidean random objects often face a difficult trade-off between geometric flexibility and theoretical tractability. We introduce the Distance Profile Embedding (DPE), a novel representation that maps random objects from general metric spaces into a Hilbert space of square-integrable functions. We prove that this mapping is injective and preserves full distributional information without requiring isometric Hilbert embeddings or one-to-one correspondence conditions. Leveraging the DPE, we develop a unified framework for marginal and conditional independence testing of random objects that enjoys a rigorous asymptotic theory for both size and power. Notably, our framework is the first in the literature to accommodate object-valued conditioning variables when testing conditional independence, overcoming the Euclidean or Hilbertian constraints of existing methodologies. We facilitate the calculation of analytic $p$-values using closed-form asymptotic null distributions, which avoids the computational burden of permutation tests common in existing metric-based methods. The numerical properties of our methods are demonstrated through both simulations and two real-world applications involving gut microbiome compositions and global human mortality distributions, respectively.

Sequential Kernel-based Conditional Independence Testing via Adaptive Betting

Testing conditional independence is fundamental yet intrinsically difficult: without additional assumptions, Type I error control is impossible in general. The "Model-X'' paradigm addresses this difficulty by assuming exact knowledge of a relevant conditional distribution. While small deviations from this assumption can sometimes be tolerated in classical one-shot testing, existing sequential conditional independence tests typically require the Model-X conditional to be known exactly, making them fragile when it must instead be estimated. We propose a new approach that is substantially more robust to such estimation error. Our method applies testing-by-betting to an adaptively optimized Kernel Conditional Independence statistic, together with a normalization scheme and a truncate-and-shift calibration strategy. These modifications greatly reduce Type I error inflation while preserving high power across high-dimensional synthetic benchmarks and real-world fairness tasks, outperforming existing sequential Model-X approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/he-zh/SKCI.