Comparing Corrupted Constrained Learning Problems

A key result in statistics is the data processing inequality, originally proved by Blackwell (1951) and later refined by DeGroot (1962) in terms of statistical uncertainty. It states that the Bayes risk of a statistical experiment obtained by stochastically modifying another experiment cannot be lower than the Bayes risk of the original experiment, regardless of the loss function or prior chosen. In machine learning, this result underlies applications such as the information bottleneck principle and some feature learning techniques. However, machine learning problems are constrained learning problems: the model class used does not include all measurable functions. We present a simple counterexample showing that the classical data processing inequality fails to hold in such a setting. Hence, we formulate a generalized data processing inequality, requiring the constrained Bayes risk of a joint distribution (with respect to a loss function and a constrained hypothesis class) to lower bound the constrained Bayes risk on the stochastically modified distribution, regardless of the choice of distribution. We show this inequality to be equivalent to a set containment condition on a specific function set induced by the loss and model class, called the superprediction set. Finally, we derive sufficient conditions for this containment.

Constrained Learning with Universally Learnable Concept Classes

We study constrained statistical learning over infinite-dimensional hypothesis classes in the fully nonconvex setting, and establish universal PACC learnability of the solutions of dual algorithms: Probably Approximately Correct on Constraints, guaranteeing optimality and constraint satisfaction at once. This strengthens near-PACC results, whose feasibility residual no amount of data can remove. Optimality is caught between generalization, governed by Rademacher complexity and favoring small classes, and strong Lagrangian duality, which rests on Lyapunov convexity for vector measures and needs decomposability, a demand pulling the other way. We reconcile the two by posing the population problem over a universal RKHS $\mathcal{H}_K$, dense in a decomposable envelope, and learning over norm balls of growing radius. This yields the Tikhonov complexity $\mathfrak{T}^{\varepsilon}_{n}$, the least RKHS norm reaching an $\varepsilon$-optimal Lagrangian level set; we prove it finite, obtain exact learnability of the optimal value, and make the sample threshold explicit and polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$ under a source condition. Feasibility is harder: absent convexity the Lagrangian may not attain its infimum, and dual information pins down only an averaged constraint-risk vector, not the risks of any returned predictor. We introduce the closure-realization gap $\varepsilon^\star_\infty$, an index of how well $\mathcal{H}_K$ retrieves feasible solutions from dualization; it is a property of the problem, not of a modeling choice. Learnability is exact when $\varepsilon^\star_\infty=0$, in particular under dual differentiability, and near-PACC with residual exactly $\varepsilon^\star_\infty$ otherwise. Finally, no distribution-free threshold exists already in the unconstrained specialization, so universality is the canonical frame for dual algorithms over large hypothesis classes.

Directional Influence Function: Estimating Training Data Influence in Constrained Learning

As constrained learning becomes increasingly common, models are trained under explicit feasibility requirements to enforce fairness, safety, robustness, regulariza- tion, and physics or logic constraints. Understanding how training samples in- fluence the model solution (e.g., learned parameters) is crucial for interpretability and robustness. The classical influence function (IF) estimates sample contribu- tions via local sensitivity analysis, measuring how the solution changes when a specific training sample is perturbed or removed. However, IF becomes unreli- able in constrained settings: data perturbations can reshape both the objective and the feasible region, leading to estimates that violate feasibility. In response, we propose the Directional Influence Function (DIF), a novel estimator that explicitly incorporates these constraints into influence estimation. DIF formulates the opti- mality conditions of constrained learning as a variational inequality (VI) and ana- lyzes how perturbing training data affects this VI. We validate DIF on constrained linear regression and demonstrate that it recovers leave-one-out retraining results, whereas IF and penalty-based IF exhibit significant bias. We further apply DIF to fairness-constrained CNNs, where DIF accurately predicts test loss changes under data removal and aligns closely with actual retraining. Our results establish DIF as an efficient and reliable tool for data attribution in constrained learning.