Feature Bagging Provides Stability

We study feature bagging through the lens of algorithmic stability. Feature bagging is an ensemble strategy that aggregates base learners trained on randomly subsampled feature subsets, possibly in a data-dependent manner. We introduce feature instability (FI), the feature-axis analogue of instance instability (II), which measures sensitivity to removing a single feature. Smaller values of II or FI correspond to stronger stability, and our experiments show that FI captures generalization-relevant information complementary to II. Within this framework, we analyze feature bagging in both a parametric linear model and a model-free setting inspired by recursive feature subsampling in random forests. In both settings, we establish formal guarantees showing that feature bagging improves the relevant stability relative to its non-bagged counterpart, with larger improvements under more aggressive subsampling. We further show that a modest number of bagging rounds is sufficient to approach the infinite-bagging stability level.

Conditional Inference Trees and Forests for Feature Selection

Conditional inference trees (CIT) and conditional inference forests (CIF) reduce split-selection bias by testing features before choosing split thresholds, but repeated permutation tests and threshold searches can make these methods computationally expensive. We study CIT and CIF as top-$k$ feature-ranking methods for downstream prediction using real-data benchmarks, runtime ablations, and synthetic feature-recovery experiments. At a fixed node, if the features and permutation budget do not depend on the node responses, Bonferroni-corrected $+1$ Monte Carlo permutation $p$-values control nodewise rejection under the complete permutation null. CIF ranks 4th among 17 classification methods on 22 datasets and 3rd among 18 regression methods on 8 datasets. With Bonferroni correction held fixed, the CIF runtime ablations indicate that adaptive stopping and the number of thresholds searched have the largest measured effect on runtime: turning off adaptive stopping and using exact threshold search increase fitting time by 4.0--8.4$\times$ and 1.9--10.8$\times$, respectively, while downstream score changes are at most 0.011. Sparse high-$p$ simulations indicate that forest feature sampling can leave informative features out of many split decisions. Overall, the results support CIF as a top-$k$ feature-ranking method in the evaluated downstream prediction benchmarks.

Optimized Sequential Testing for Binary Ensemble Classifiers

Ensemble classifiers are predictive models that combine the results of simpler base models, often by majority vote. A classic example is random forests, which combine the predictions of decision trees. Ensembles that use more base models can be more accurate but also more costly to train and run. In this paper, we consider strategies for reducing the computational cost of binary classification using an approach from the field of sequential testing. Rather than evaluating all the base models and taking a majority vote, we evaluate the base models sequentially and stop execution when a clear majority emerges. We consider three different notions of optimality for early-stopping strategies that minimize the number of base models executed while controlling the rate of disagreement with the full ensemble. For each notion of optimality and allowable disagreement rate, we show that a linear program can be constructed and solved efficiently to find the optimal stopping strategy. We tested these methods on real-world datasets taken from the UC Irvine Machine Learning repository, and on the benchmark datasets proposed by Grinsztajn et al. We found that on most datasets, these methods provide speed-ups of 4x or more while controlling disagreement at 0.1%