Statistical Properties of Robust Learning under Distributional Shifts

Distributional shifts arise when the target deployment environment differs from the source environment that generated the training data. Robust learning frameworks such as Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) and Robust Satisficing (RS) aim to address this challenge, yet their finite-sample guarantees under such shifts, and their systematic comparison, remain underexplored: existing analyses typically establish guarantees either in the source environment or for adversarial worst-case performance over an ambiguity set. This paper instead studies generalization error in the target environment---the excess loss under the shifted target distribution. Our contributions are threefold. First, we derive finite-sample generalization error bounds in the shifted target environment for both DRO and RS. These bounds explicitly characterize the trade-off between reduced sensitivity to shift and the regularization penalty induced by each method's robustness hyperparameter, and they avoid the curse of dimensionality associated with Wasserstein empirical concentration. Second, when partial shift information such as shift magnitude or direction is available, we propose information-directed hyperparameter calibrations and compare the two methods given the same information. Under these calibrations, and in the partial-information regimes we study, DRO and RS exhibit complementary theoretical and empirical behavior. Finally, we apply the framework to a network lot-sizing problem, using it to interpret how robust policies respond to positive shifts in the demand distribution. Together, these results fill a gap in understanding the statistical properties of robust learning methods under distributional shifts and provide a principled basis for comparing DRO and RS.

Smart predict-then-robustly-optimize

In this paper, we propose and study a robust variant of the smart predict-then-optimize approach that accounts for prediction shifts due to disturbance in the covariate feature space. While traditional integrated-learning-and-optimization models assume that side information is perfectly revealed, empirical data-driven features are frequently corrupted or noisy at the time of decision-making, leading to fragile operational policies. To bridge this gap, we integrate principles of robust optimization directly into the predictive-prescriptive pipeline via a smart predict-then-robustly optimize loss and establish a computationally tractable convex surrogate, designed to hedge against worst-case feature perturbations. On the theoretical front, we formalize the structural validity of this surrogate by proving its approximation error probability decays exponentially according to a sub-Gaussian concentration profile. Furthermore, we establish that under mild assumptions, the surrogate is Fisher consistent with high probability. We also prove necessary conditions under which our framework outperforms standard smart predict-then-optimize and maintain its superiority even when the standard method is equipped with regularized upstream predictions. Numerical experiments validate that our robust framework consistently yields significant performance improvements over standard methods, both in out-of-sample terms and in training stability.

Maximally Robust Satisficing Bayesian Optimization

Many design tasks can be cast as black-box function optimization, enabling use of Bayesian optimization to find an ideal design with minimal number of trials. However, often we do not actually need the optimum but instead a sufficiently good solution is enough, for instance a material that is durable enough for its intended use. In most cases there are multiple satisfactory solutions, forming a superlevel set of the function, raising a key question of which one to prefer. We answer this by explaining why robustness to input perturbations that may occur when the solution is deployed is a good criterion and by introduce a Bayesian optimization method that efficiently finds satisficing solutions that are robust to maximally large perturbations. In contrast to previous works, we assume the inputs can be accurately controlled during optimization, but will be perturbed after the deployment.

A Robust Optimization Approach to Sparse Principal Component Analysis

While principal component analysis (PCA) is a fundamental tool for dimensionality reduction, its dense representations make it ill-suited for high-dimensional data. Existing methods address this by promoting sparsity through explicit $\ell_1$-penalties, but these are not obvious to tune due to the unsupervised nature of the task. In contrast, we propose Adversarial PCA (AdvPCA), which leverages robust optimization to achieve sparsity by optimizing the reconstruction objective against bounded, worst-case latent space perturbations. We show that this formulation admits a closed-form reduction, leading to a practical iterative algorithm that alternates between adversarial linear regression-style updates for the sparse encoder and orthogonal updates for the decoder. By theoretically characterizing the solution, we derive a data-adaptive parameterization that allows the algorithm to perform effectively out of the box. We validate these claims through numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world genomics data.

Robust and Fast Training via Per-Sample Clipping

We propose a robust gradient estimator based on per-sample gradient clipping and analyze its properties both theoretically and empirically. We show that the resulting method, per-sample clipped SGD (PS-Clip-SGD), achieves optimal in-expectation convergence rates for non-convex optimization problems under heavy-tailed gradient noise. Moreover, we establish high-probability convergence guarantees that match the in-expectation rates up to polylogarithmic factors in the failure probability. We complement our theoretical results with multiple numerical experiments. In particular, we demonstrate that PS-Clip-SGD outperforms both vanilla SGD with momentum and standard gradient clipping when training AlexNet on the CIFAR-100 dataset, even after accounting for the additional computational time caused by per-sample clipping. We also empirically show that, in the presence of gradient accumulation, applying clipping at the mini-batch level can improve training performance while incurring virtually no additional computational cost. This finding is particularly interesting, as it contradicts the common practice of applying clipping only after all accumulation steps have been completed.