Cross-Trajectory Chimera Interventions Reveal Dissociable Roles of Weight Magnitude and Direction in Grokking

Which properties of a partially trained network are causally portable to a different, independently trained network? Single-trajectory interventions show necessity within one run, not portability across runs. We introduce cross-trajectory chimera interventions: given two runs from different seeds, we split each weight vector into a norm and a unit direction, recombine one run's norm with the other's direction, and continue training. On two modular-arithmetic tasks that grok, the components dissociate. Direction carries a transferable, donor-specific circuit identity: implanting a donor's direction at the recipient's norm drives the run to the donor's circuit in 40/40 cases, while an angle-matched random control yields no shift. The transfer is threshold-like, and its location is predicted by the recipient's norm, separating perfectly by norm class over all 20 pairs (joint permutation probability 1.9e-4). Norm carries only a modest, distributed delay effect and no identity signal. An adaptive bisection procedure localizes the threshold to +/-1/64. Direction indexes which solution a trajectory approaches; norm governs how susceptible that identity is to being overwritten.

The Weight Norm Sets the Grokking Timescale: A Causal Delay Law

Grokking is the delayed onset of generalization in neural networks, arising long after they fit the training data. Whether the weight norm causes this delay is disputed: some studies report a critical norm at the transition, others observe grokking with no fixed norm at all. We settle this by intervening on the norm during training rather than only observing it. Under free training with weight decay, networks grok when the weight norm reaches a value Wc that varies little across seeds and learning rates (CV 1 to 2 percent) and grows with the modular base as a power law. When we instead clamp the norm to a fixed multiple rho of Wc and hold it there, the network still groks, but the delay follows T_grok proportional to exp(alpha rho). One exponent, alpha near 7.5, fits this delay across four moduli (R^2 = 0.996). Over the swept ranges the held norm moves the delay by about 19x and the learning rate by only about 2x, and holding the norm above Wc slows grokking rather than preventing it. A final LayerNorm removes the dependence by decoupling weight scale from the network function; without it the exponential law returns. This pinned-norm delay is the exponential counterpart to the logarithmic delay predicted for a freely contracting norm.