Vision Models Predict Urban Scene Appraisal with Limited Neural Alignment

Pretrained vision embeddings are increasingly used as general-purpose representations for modelling how people appraise urban scenes, and are validated almost entirely by how well they predict human ratings. High predictive accuracy does not establish that these embeddings organise scenes as human perception does. We test the two properties separately against brain data. Using openly released EEG from 63 adults who viewed and rated 56 Berlin street scenes, we estimate the representational geometry of the scenes over time, the proportion of that geometry that is explainable at all, and its correspondence with seventeen feature spaces spanning language-supervised, self-supervised, category-supervised and dense-prediction training, two orders of magnitude of scale, and interpretable controls. Correspondence is low throughout: the best representation, DINOv2 ViT-B, reaches 29.6% of the lower bound of the noise ceiling, the panel spans 11.0% to 29.6%, and a Gabor energy descriptor is indistinguishable from the best model while outperforming every language-supervised model tested. Within a model, deeper layers still match later neural responses, so the hierarchical correspondence found for object recognition survives even at this low overall level. The same embeddings predict held-out appraisal ratings well, up to r = 0.87, and the two measures do not track each other across models; reweighting features towards the neural geometry lowers appraisal prediction for every model tested, against a control of matched dimensionality. Predicting how a street is appraised is therefore weak evidence that a model represents the street as the brain does. The benchmark uses only public data and requires no training, so evaluating a new representation needs only its embeddings for 55 images.

Brain-Aligned Multi-Stream Video Transformers with Sparse Self-Selection

Modern video transformers typically ignore principles from primate vision and are rarely evaluated against neural data, limiting their biological interpretability. We introduce a sparse winner-takes-all token selection module that replaces dense self-attention to improve efficiency and approximate competitive routing observed in biological visual circuits. We further propose a neuro-inspired split-and-fuse video transformer which uses two complementary pathways: a high-resolution, low-frame-rate "what" stream and a low-resolution, high-frame-rate "where" stream, fused before classification. On Kinetics-400 and Something-Something V2, our best variant operates on the Pareto frontier of accuracy versus inference time among models of comparable scale and pretraining, and showing improved robustness to spatial perturbations. Using representational similarity analysis between model embeddings and time-resolved EEG recordings for the same video stimuli, our model attains a peak brain-model correlation of 0.18 (about 78% of the noise ceiling) and consistently outperforms strong video transformer baselines, suggesting that pathway specialization and sparse competition are useful inductive biases for efficient, brain-aligned video understanding.

Meta-learning as a principle for human-like visual representations

The structure of human visual representations underpins our capacity for adaptive behaviour. While pretrained neural networks model human visual representations with unprecedented success, a large discrepancy remains. We propose one reason: these networks optimise a single fixed objective, whereas human representations must support open-ended tasks. We hypothesise this flexibility arises from meta-learning (learning to learn), a pressure shaping representations to acquire new tasks from few observations. To test this, we train a sequence model, without any supervision from human data, across thousands of semantically rich tasks mapping images to high-level concepts. Compared to their pretrained base encoders, meta-learned representations better predict human similarity judgements, semantic rule learning, and high-level visual cortex. Behavioural gains depend on disentangled, high-level task distributions, while brain alignment is driven primarily by the learning-to-learn pressure. Our results suggest the flexibility of human visual representations reflects the functional demand to learn new semantic relationships on the fly.

Beyond representational alignment with brain-guided language models for robust reasoning

The correspondence between large language models (LLMs) and the neural mechanisms underlying human higher-order cognition remains insufficiently characterized. Given that language and reasoning in the human brain appear dissociable, an open question is whether LLMs align with neural signals from reasoning-related regions and whether such signals can improve them. Here, focusing on deductive reasoning, we show that LLM internal representations are not only partially aligned with task-fMRI activity but can also be directly enhanced by these signals. Using a neural-predictivity metric, we find that LLMs explain a substantial fraction of the explainable variance in reasoning-related regions at the aggregate level, whereas predictivity within specific reasoning types is lower, indicating both alignment and divergence. Building on this, we propose a brain-guided framework: we steer model representations along directions induced by the joint structure of model and brain representations, applying intervention at inference and fine-tuning during training. We demonstrate that task-evoked brain signals can directly enhance LLM reasoning, yielding gains orthogonal to language-only supervision across 10 LLMs (1.5B-72B), with transfer across reasoning types and up to 13\% absolute accuracy gain. Our results advance LLM-brain correspondences from correlation to guidance, establishing a brain-signal-driven pathway toward more robust and cognitively aligned AI.

Cross-Species RSA Reveals Conserved Early Visual Alignment but Divergent Higher-Area Rankings Across Human fMRI and Macaque Electrophysiology

Does the relationship between learning rules and brain alignment generalize across species? We extend our prior finding that untrained CNNs match backpropagation at human V1 by testing the same five learning rules against macaque electrophysiology. The rules are backpropagation (BP), feedback alignment (FA), predictive coding (PC), spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), and an untrained random-weights baseline. The macaque data come from two datasets: MajajHong2015 (V4/IT, 3,200 stimulus presentations, 88/168 neurons) and FreemanZiemba2013 (V1/V2, 135 stimuli, 102/103 neurons). Using RSA with identical model weights from our human study, we find: (1) all models achieve higher alignment with macaque early visual cortex (rho = 0.15-0.30 at V1/V2) than with human fMRI (rho = 0.01-0.08), consistent with the higher signal-to-noise ratio of electrophysiology; (2) STDP and PC produce the highest macaque V1/V2 alignment (rho ~ 0.30 and 0.28), consistent with their leading position among trained rules in human V1; (3) at IT, learning rule rankings show no detectable correlation across species (Kendall's tau = 0.00, p = 1.00), though this null result is expected given that n = 5 provides power only at tau = +/-1.0, and is further confounded by stimulus set differences; (4) a pretrained ResNet-50 (ImageNet) achieves rho = 0.25 at macaque IT, substantially above all custom CNN conditions (rho = 0.07-0.14), suggesting IT alignment is limited by model capacity and training data rather than by the learning rule. Noise ceilings, multi-seed variability (5 seeds), and a stimulus-control analysis are reported. These results demonstrate that early visual alignment is robust across species, while higher-area alignment is modulated by model capacity and stimulus domain.

Cross-lingual robustness of LLM-brain alignment and its computational roots

Large language models (LLMs) reliably predict neural activity during language comprehension and transformer depth has been interpreted as mirroring hierarchical cortical organization. However, it remains unclear whether such alignment extends to subcortical regions, overlaps spatially across languages, and what the computational roots of such alignment are. Here, we used a multilingual, whole-brain encoding framework to examine brain-LLM alignment across three typologically distinct languages: Mandarin, English, and French during naturalistic story listening. Our results show that across languages, transformer-based models predicted activity in a distributed landscape spanning widely distributed cortical functional networks like limbic, ventral attention, default mode network, and subcortical structures. Spatial alignment patterns showed substantial cross-linguistic overlap and remained largely stable across model layers, with limited layer progression consistent with functional cortical hierarchies. Contrary to previous evidence, contextual embeddings did not outperform static embeddings. To test candidate computational explanations, we examined whether layer-wise brain scores reflect surprisal and intrinsic dimensionality, and thereby predictive processing and information compression. Neither of these two computational metrics mirrored neural alignment profiles. Our findings suggest that brain-LLM alignment is spatially robust and cross-linguistically stable but not explainable from predictive uncertainty or representational geometry. Rather than directly reflecting shared hierarchical computation, neural predictivity may primarily arise from distributed lexical-semantic correspondences that generalize across languages.