Skip to results
MLSift
← Feed
routineRobotics & Embodied AILeWorldModel2607.12547

Mind the Gap: Promises and Pitfalls of Hierarchical Planning in LeWorldModel

Niccolò Caselli, Salvatore Lo Sardo, Francesco Massafra, Ippokratis Pantelidis, Samuele Punzo, Sathya Kamesh Bhethanabhotla

cs.RO cs.AI cs.LG

Abstract

We investigate whether temporal hierarchy can improve LeWorldModel on long-horizon goal-conditioned control. We introduce Hi-LeWM, an extension that freezes the pretrained low-level LeWM and adds high-level planning over latent subgoals. We evaluate Hi-LeWM on PushT and Cube across increasing goal offsets. Hierarchy does not automatically improve performance: at short horizons, the best configuration uses a one-step high-level horizon, while longer horizons reveal a mismatch between the learned high-level action space and the inference-time search distribution. Experiments with true future latent subgoals show that the frozen low-level controller can execute well-aligned intermediate targets, indicating that high-level subgoal generation is the main bottleneck. Unconstrained search can select latent macro-actions that appear favorable under the learned model but produce poor control targets. Constraining search around macro-actions encoded from training trajectories, with appropriate subgoal execution timing, recovers useful hierarchical regimes, improving over flat LeWM by +11.3 percentage points at medium-range horizons and +14.7 percentage points at the longest PushT horizon. Overall, temporal abstraction can benefit compact frozen LeWM, but only when high-level search remains compatible with the low-level controller

Topics

Classified with taxonomy v2 on Wed, 2 Sept 2026.

The PDF is 1–3 MB. Open it in your browser's viewer, or load it here.

Open PDF