Vision Models Predict Urban Scene Appraisal with Limited Neural Alignment

Pretrained vision embeddings are increasingly used as general-purpose representations for modelling how people appraise urban scenes, and are validated almost entirely by how well they predict human ratings. High predictive accuracy does not establish that these embeddings organise scenes as human perception does. We test the two properties separately against brain data. Using openly released EEG from 63 adults who viewed and rated 56 Berlin street scenes, we estimate the representational geometry of the scenes over time, the proportion of that geometry that is explainable at all, and its correspondence with seventeen feature spaces spanning language-supervised, self-supervised, category-supervised and dense-prediction training, two orders of magnitude of scale, and interpretable controls. Correspondence is low throughout: the best representation, DINOv2 ViT-B, reaches 29.6% of the lower bound of the noise ceiling, the panel spans 11.0% to 29.6%, and a Gabor energy descriptor is indistinguishable from the best model while outperforming every language-supervised model tested. Within a model, deeper layers still match later neural responses, so the hierarchical correspondence found for object recognition survives even at this low overall level. The same embeddings predict held-out appraisal ratings well, up to r = 0.87, and the two measures do not track each other across models; reweighting features towards the neural geometry lowers appraisal prediction for every model tested, against a control of matched dimensionality. Predicting how a street is appraised is therefore weak evidence that a model represents the street as the brain does. The benchmark uses only public data and requires no training, so evaluating a new representation needs only its embeddings for 55 images.

Brain-Aligned Multi-Stream Video Transformers with Sparse Self-Selection

Modern video transformers typically ignore principles from primate vision and are rarely evaluated against neural data, limiting their biological interpretability. We introduce a sparse winner-takes-all token selection module that replaces dense self-attention to improve efficiency and approximate competitive routing observed in biological visual circuits. We further propose a neuro-inspired split-and-fuse video transformer which uses two complementary pathways: a high-resolution, low-frame-rate "what" stream and a low-resolution, high-frame-rate "where" stream, fused before classification. On Kinetics-400 and Something-Something V2, our best variant operates on the Pareto frontier of accuracy versus inference time among models of comparable scale and pretraining, and showing improved robustness to spatial perturbations. Using representational similarity analysis between model embeddings and time-resolved EEG recordings for the same video stimuli, our model attains a peak brain-model correlation of 0.18 (about 78% of the noise ceiling) and consistently outperforms strong video transformer baselines, suggesting that pathway specialization and sparse competition are useful inductive biases for efficient, brain-aligned video understanding.

Meta-learning as a principle for human-like visual representations

The structure of human visual representations underpins our capacity for adaptive behaviour. While pretrained neural networks model human visual representations with unprecedented success, a large discrepancy remains. We propose one reason: these networks optimise a single fixed objective, whereas human representations must support open-ended tasks. We hypothesise this flexibility arises from meta-learning (learning to learn), a pressure shaping representations to acquire new tasks from few observations. To test this, we train a sequence model, without any supervision from human data, across thousands of semantically rich tasks mapping images to high-level concepts. Compared to their pretrained base encoders, meta-learned representations better predict human similarity judgements, semantic rule learning, and high-level visual cortex. Behavioural gains depend on disentangled, high-level task distributions, while brain alignment is driven primarily by the learning-to-learn pressure. Our results suggest the flexibility of human visual representations reflects the functional demand to learn new semantic relationships on the fly.