Mutual information and sensitivity analysis for feature selection in customer targeting: a comparative study

Feature selection is a highly relevant task in a data-driven knowledge discovery project. Several techniques have been developed aiming at finding the features that influence most an outcome to predict, including mutual information and, in recent years, the data-based sensitivity analysis. The present research focus on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each of these two techniques, by applying both to a bank telemarketing case. Thereafter, a logistic regression model is built on the tuned set of features identified by each of the two techniques as the most influencing set of features on the success of a telemarketing contact, in a total of 13 features for mutual information and 9 features for the data-based sensitivity analysis. The latter performs better for lower values of false positives while the former is slightly better for a higher false positive ratio. Thus, mutual information becomes a better choice if bank managers intend to reduce slightly the cost of contacts without risking losing a high number of successes. Such results show that mutual information, although not recent, is still a valid method for feature selection. On the other side, the data-based sensitivity analysis selection achieved good prediction results with less features.

Fourier Preconditioning for Neural Feature Learning

Mutual information (MI)-inspired feature learning techniques are capable of generating low-dimensional embeddings that retain nonlinear dependence structures, but direct estimations of MI suffer from noisy probability distribution estimates in the low-data regime. The H-Score objective, computed from second-order statistics, provides a practical proxy metric for training feature extraction networks. We prove that H-Score is invariant to invertible transformations in the unrestricted functional setting, but becomes sensitive to input basis rotations under constrained approximation classes. Consequently, we study unitary preconditioning for H-Score networks and show that selecting an appropriate basis rotation reduces finite-width truncation error by concentrating predictive dependence into fewer dominant modes. We identify the fast Fourier transform (FFT) as an effective data-independent, low-cost preconditioner for approximately stationary processes, where spectral structure induces concentration of the cross-covariance singular value spectrum. We introduce training-free metrics based on spectral entropy and cumulative dependence energy to quantify basis suitability and predict downstream inference gains prior to network training. Experiments across eight multivariate datasets demonstrate that FFT preconditioning is particularly useful in resource-constrained regimes, achieving up to 50% normalized mean squared error (NMSE) reduction, while the proposed metrics correlate with observed performance gains and correctly identify cases where spectral preconditioning is detrimental.

Geometric and Information Compression of Representations in Deep Learning

Deep neural networks transform input data into latent representations that support a wide range of downstream tasks. These representations can be characterized along information-theoretic and geometric dimensions, but their relationship remains poorly understood. A central open question is whether low mutual information (MI) between inputs and representations necessarily implies geometrically compressed latent spaces and vice versa. We investigate this question using class-wise clustering as a measure of geometric compression and theoretically sound MI estimation in conditional entropy bottleneck (CEB) networks and continuous dropout networks. We evaluate the interplay between MI, geometric compression, and generalization on classification tasks under controlled noise injection schemes. Our findings show that low MI does not reliably correspond to geometric compression, and that the connection between the two is more nuanced than often assumed. Indeed, our experiments reveal a negative and nonlinear relationship that can reverse when varying training setup. Our results put forward a hypothesis that generalization acts as a potential confounder in this connection rather than being their direct consequence.

Epistemic Uncertainty Is Not the Reducible Kind

The standard taxonomy of predictive uncertainty defines epistemic uncertainty as the part removable by collecting more data, while the standard measure identifies it with a mutual-information term. We prove the definition and the measure are extensionally inconsistent. On an explicit construction, the measure assigns all uncertainty to the epistemic class, yet no quantity of training data reduces it. Reducibility is instead a property of the pair (uncertainty, acquisition class), and the dichotomy resolves into three parts: aleatoric, sample-reducible epistemic, and mechanism-reducible epistemic uncertainty. An exact identity for the value of an observation shows that in-distribution data never reduces mechanism-irreducible uncertainty and generically increases it. Ensemble disagreement, the deployed epistemic estimate, tracks the training procedure rather than the epistemic term. It collapses to zero beneath a positive truth under consistent training, and equals hyperparameter-scaled initialization noise under interpolation. A finite-sample falsification test and seed-swept experiments confirm the theory.

Submodular Benchmark Selection

Evaluating large language models across many benchmarks is expensive, yet many benchmarks are highly correlated. We formalize the selection of a small, informative subset as submodular maximization under a multivariate Gaussian model. Entropy (log-determinant covariance) and mutual information between selected and remaining benchmarks arise as natural objectives. Both are submodular; entropy selection coincides with pivoted Cholesky and has spectral residual bounds, while mutual information is non-monotone in general but empirically monotone for small subsets, so we optimize it greedily. Experiments on three matrices from ten public leaderboards show that mutual information selection outperforms entropy for imputation at small subsets.

Quantum Feature Selection with Higher-Order Binary Optimization on Trapped-Ion Hardware

We present a quantum feature-selection framework based on a higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) formulation that explicitly incorporates multivariate dependencies beyond standard quadratic encodings. In contrast to QUBO-based approaches, the proposed model includes one-, two-, and three-body interaction terms derived from mutual-information measures, enabling the objective function to capture feature relevance, pairwise redundancy, and higher-order statistical structure within a unified energy model. To suppress trivial all-selected solutions, we further include structured linear penalties that promote sparsity while preserving informative variables. The resulting HUBO instances are optimized with digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization on IonQ Forte and compared against noiseless quantum simulation as well as two classical dimensionality-reduction baselines: SelectKBest based on mutual information and principal component analysis (PCA). We evaluate the proposed workflow on two benchmark classification datasets, namely the Gallstone dataset and the Spambase dataset, and analyze both predictive performance and selected-subset structure. The results show good qualitative agreement between hardware executions and noiseless simulations, supporting the feasibility of implementing higher-order feature-selection Hamiltonians on current trapped-ion processors. In addition, the quantum approach yields competitive classification performance while producing compact and informative feature subsets, highlighting the potential of higher-order quantum optimization for machine-learning preprocessing tasks.